Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central Afr. Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo (Kinshasa)
C�te d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
São Tomé
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Western Sahara
Zambia
Zimbabwe
|
Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!
Print this page
Note: This document is from the archive of the Africa Policy E-Journal, published
by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC) from 1995 to 2001 and by Africa Action
from 2001 to 2003. APIC was merged into Africa Action in 2001. Please note that many outdated links in this archived
document may not work.
|
Tanzania: World Bank Meeting, Demonstration
Tanzania: World Bank Meeting, Demonstration
Date distributed (ymd): 010301
Document reposted by APIC
+++++++++++++++++++++Document Profile+++++++++++++++++++++
Region: Continent-Wide
Issue Areas: +political/rights+ +economy/development+
+gender/women+
Summary Contents:
This posting contains three Tanzanian non-governmental statements
concering the February visit of World Bank and IMF leaders to
Tanzania - an initial statement to the international financial
institution leaders from the Tanzania Gender Networking Programme
(TGNP), and then reports by TGNP member Dr. Margorie Mbilinyi and
the Tanzania Association of NGOs (TANGO) subsequent to police
arrests of demonstrators outside the meeting site.
Recent related postings on the trip and World Bank / IMF policies
can be found at
http://www.africafocus.org/docs01/wb0102.php> and
http://www.africafocus.org/docs01/cash0101.php>
Earlier postings concerning World Bank plans and Tanzania include
http://www.africafocus.org/docs00/tan0006.htm and
http://www.africafocus.org/docs00/tan0011.htm
+++++++++++++++++end profile++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tanzania Gender Networking Programme (TGNP)
P.O. Box 8921 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Located on Mabibo Road,
Adjacent to the National Institute of Transport
Ph.: 255 - 22 - 244.3205, 244.3450, 244.3286
Mobile: 255 - 742 783659, 788706
Fax : 255 - 22 - 244.3244
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: http://www.tgnp.co.tz
21 February 2001
STATEMENT FROM GENDER GROUPS TO CHIEF EXECUTIVES OF THE WORLD BANK/
IMF AT THEIR MEETING IN DAR ES SALAAM
The Tanzania Gender Networking Programme (TGNP) and other gender
groups have followed with interest the visit this week by the IMF
and World Bank heads to Africa, and Tanzania in particular. In
their press release, these visitors from the two major
nternational Financial Institutions have declared their interest
in listening to the voices of Africans when designing and
implementing policies. However, these drivers of the world's
macro-economic policies have yet to demonstrate that they are
following a very new or different approach to development. For
example, in their schedules of consultative sessions in Tanzania,
they only plan to devote a one-hour session on the last day of
their visit for meetings with civil society actors. This practice
seems to directly negate these institutions_ proposal to work in
partnership with the civil society in Africa. Therefore, we expect
this one-hour meeting to be quality time with the Chief Executives
of both institutions and not only with officials.
The issues on the agenda for discussion at this week's meetings
with African leaders, namely the economy, HIV and AIDS, trade
liberalisation, and corruption are of vital interest to women, men
and youth in Tanzania. However, they have not put on the agenda
for discussion the larger frameworks driving their policies, such
as liberalisation, privatisation, and debt. In the past, the
strategies designed have not taken into account the needs of
various stakeholder groups in Tanzania and other African
countries, and their impacts have been more destructive than
positive. For example, a major evaluation of the Bank's work in
Africa commissioned by Norway concluded that the design and
implementation of the economic liberalisation packages [in Malawi,
Zambia and Zimbabwe] have at best had a limited impact on current
poverty and at worst contributed to an increase in poverty.
World Bank and IMF economic and social policies, including
privatisation and liberalisation of markets, to date have had
negative effects on the livelihoods of people in Tanzania. This is
nowhere more evident than in agriculture, where many smallholder
farmers face financial ruin, due to the failure by government to
create viable, competitive markets, and the unjust trade practices
adopted by the large-scale agribusiness corporations to purchase
their crops. Crop prices are falling, farm input prices are
rising, and many of these vital inputs are often not delivered at
all, or not on time. The food security of the whole nation is now
at risk, as a result of liberalisation, and its negative impact on
food production carried out by smallholder farmers, especially
those in the south and west of the country, which was formerly the
breadbasket of Tanzania. In addition, Pastoralist
livestock-keepers have been completely neglected by these
policies.
While the Bank claims to uphold the importance of equity as the
basis for stable society and economic growth, little in its
policies seems to actualise this goal. In terms of imports and
exports, most of the imports have been detrimental to the local
markets, such as used clothes and milk. Factories that have been
privatised since the introduction of Structural Adjustment
Programmes (SAPs) have been working at lower capacity, with fewer
staff, and a number have gone out of operation. For example, the
textile industry, once a major growth industry in Tanzania, has
collapsed. The initial perception of job creation from the
privatisation exercise has not proven to be valid.
Due to user fees and privatisation of public services, fewer people
are accessing education and vital health services. One result of
this is that enrolment rates in primary school have declined from
93% in the 1980s to 66% in the 1990s. Supposed exceptions of users
fees for the provision of health services in relation to
pregnancy, AIDS, mental illness and other health issues are not
functioning in Tanzania, particularly burdening poorer social
groups. A dual system of education and health has emerged, such
that the rich and their children monopolise high cost private
schools and medical facilities, leaving the poor to use the
under-financed public social service system.
The issue of debt has not been on the agenda for discussion with
African countries, although it is an issue that clearly requires
dialogue between Africans and the Bank, as the current debt relief
arrangement is inadequate. As Tanzania has carefully followed the
guidelines set down by the IMF and the World Bank, it will now be
eligible for debt relief through the HIPC initiative (Heavily
Indebted Poor Countries). This initiative was used as an incentive
for Tanzania to comply with thirty additional adjustment
conditions, many with heavy social costs for Tanzanians, youth and
women in particular. The amount of money being saved from debt
relief is marginal compared to the total money being used for debt
servicing. In fact, debt service payments will actually increase
in 2001 through 2004 (compared to 1999-2000), and Tanzania is
expected to pay 145.1 billion shillings for debt servicing in the
year 2001/02, at least 9 times more than it spends on health care.
This has serious implications, particularly for a country where 40%
of the population dies before the age of 35.
Most invidious of all, however, is the timeframe of twenty years,
which really means twenty years of debt bondage and twenty years
of forced compliance with structural adjustment measures,
euphemistically called 'economic stabilisation'. Most critics
agree that economic stabilisation based on World Bank and IMF
prescriptions only furthers poverty and inequality, and in no way
reduces them.
During their visit, one of the goals of the World Bank and IMF
Chief Executive's visit is to discuss ways to decrease poverty and
decrease dependency. In order to actualise these objectives and to
work with Africans, men women and youth, we propose the following
major recommendations:
- Development by the World Bank and IMF of clear and transparent
planning, implementation and monitoring processes. Civil society
actors from the Global South as well as the general public, women,
men, and youth should be involved as actors and beneficiaries of
these processes at all levels.
- Ending promotion of privatisation of basic government services,
including health, education, water, and sanitation, and abandoning
the promotion of user fees for basic services.
- Cancellation by the IMF and World Bank of all debts owed. This
would provide a serious burden impeding the development of
Tanzania and provide a base for a more realistic type of
partnership with the Global North.
- Ensure that conditions of structural adjustment and
macro-economic reform, which have increased poverty and
inequalities, are redesigned to address poverty eradication in
line with the priorities of the poor themselves.
- Consider new structures, existence and policies of the World Bank
and IMF that are determined through a democratic, participatory
and transparent process. This process should accord full
consideration of the interests of the women, men and youth most
affected by the policies and practices of the institutions and
include a significant role for all parts of civil society.
Prof. Marjorie Mbilinyi, Member, TGNP, 24.2.01
P O Box 35185 University of Dar es Salaam Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
tel 255 22- 2410075 or 2410500/8 ext. 2615 fax 255 22- 2410078
[email protected]
"WE HAVE COME TO LISTEN"
The heads of the World Bank and IMF reportedly came to Africa "to
listen." Aha, listen to whom?
A peaceful demonstration was organised by local activist NGOs at
the meeting site of the heads of the IMF and the World Bank and the
presidents of ten Eastern and Southern African countries on Friday,
February 23, 2001. The activists were moved to hold a
demonstration because of the exclusion of civil society
organisations in the talks, and the desire to express their views
in as public a manner as possible. Their main focus was on the need
for total debt cancellation and a different approach to
development. Some of the placards read: "Why do IMF and World Bank
rob the poor to pay the rich?" "end debt slavery" "Charges for
education and health can only be paid by James Wolfensohn and Horst
Kohler" "We want total debt cancellation"
The police used force to stop the demonstration. Three activists
were arrested on the spot, including a staff member of Tanzania
Gender Networking Programme (TGNP), Daudi Kweba and two leaders of
the National Youth Forum (Gwandumi Mwakatobe and Lito Kabwe), and
bundled into police cars. A journalist from a major daily
newspaper, Mtanzania, Jackton Manyerere, was severely beaten by
police when he tried to pick up some of the fallen placards. The
chairperson of TGNP, Demere Kitunga, was beaten at Central Police
Station when she arrived to bail out the others, and later
arrested, along with three other members of TGNP. A total of seven
activists were held and interrogated for six hours, and only
released at nightfall after the intervention of five top human
rights lawyers.
On Saturday, February 24, 2001, the heads of IMF and the World Bank
held a briefing session with the press, the private sector, donors
and civil society organisations, under the chair of the President
of Tanzania, Benjamin Mkapa. The way in which this meeting was
organised illustrated the illusory nature of democracy within the
International Financial Institutions, and the dependent governments
they support, especially in the light of the previous day's police
repression. First of all, the meeting was by invitation only, with
many organisations excluded. The Presidents of IMF, the World Bank
and Tanzania each spoke briefly. [The general consensus among
activists was that there was nothing new!] Questions were
restricted to the press. The meeting was cut short after about 30
minutes of questions and answer, just as activist NGOs were about
to raise questions. Hence, we were duped into attending a glorified
press conference as mere passive spectators, along with ambassadors
from donor countries, United Nations development agencies,
representatives of 'the private sector' as well as activist NGOs.
The explanation for the change in timetable? The visitors had to be
rushed to Ngorongoro Crater Area by air where they would hold
discussions with Ministry of Finance officials! [Ngorongoro Crater
Area is a good example of the growth of tourist/wildlife industry
at the expense of the rights and welfare of local communities.]
However, before their departure, there was enough time for a
cocktail party, with ample alcoholic beverages and scrumptious
bites for a select few to meet informally with the visiting
imperial Heads of IMF and World Bank, their local representatives
and top government officials.
During the meeting, one sympathetic member of the press asked the
IFI heads whether they enjoyed the arrest and brutal handling of
the demonstrators on the previous day. The head of World Bank
cynically replied that given his experiences elsewhere, "yesterday
was a holiday". So much for commitment to "broadbased consultative
processes"! On the other hand, President Mkapa replied that the
police had erred, that the protesters were serving the interests of
the country, and concluded, "I assure you that they have a right to
express an opinion." Whether this was merely a public relations
gesture will reveal itself later. So far, those arrested are out on
bail, but remain charged with illegal assembly.
The whole exercise calls into question the meaning of participation
and consultation from the perspectives of the IFIs and their client
governments. It reinforces doubts about prospects of reform from
within these institutions, and the urgent need to build a broad
social movement for change. The arrogance portrayed today by
leaders of institutions and nations is symptomatic of the gap
between them and the people they rule.
Tanzania Association of Non-Governmental Organisations (TANGO)
P.O. Box 31147, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Tel/Fax: 255-22-2762208
E-mail: [email protected]
Message to the Government and the People of Our Country.
February 25, 2001
The political parties and certain individuals in the government
think that they hold the destiny of this country in their hands and
that the non-partisan citizens are passive recipients of their
directives. A number of events have occurred in Tanzania that
illustrate this ideology. We, as individual citizens and civil
society organisations, are demanding respect, a voice and equal
participation in shaping the destiny of our country.
Friday, February 23 2001 at the meeting between top executives of
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank and Heads
of States of Sub-Saharan Africa, representatives from youth, human
rights, gender and other civil society organisations conveyed a
message to the leaders of the Bretton-Woods institutions. The
message of the civil society organisations was that the policies
and conditions set by the Bretton-Woods institutions are unfair
and hurting the people. They are choking the life out of our health
care facilities, shrinking our education system, systematically
dispossessing us of our resources, and discriminating against our
farmers and our manufacturers. The policy terms may look good on
paper and produce some impressive economic indicators, however, we
are suffering. We believe that the welfare of the people is more
important than statistics.
As the Bretton-Woods leaders and heads of states emerged from the
Sheraton, a few concerned citizens displayed their banners and
placards. They were immediately arrested, taken to the central
police station and detained. When other concerned citizens,
including the chairperson of the Tanzania Gender Networking Program
(TGNP), went to bail her colleagues out of jail, she was also
arrested, detained and assaulted by police! A journalist was also
assaulted by police when attempting to read the placards. TANGO
demands an explanation of these arrests: Why are the police
paranoid and threatened when people express themselves? Who
authorised this unconstitutional action by the police and what
action will be taken against him or her? We also insist on an
apology from the police for their oppressive, intimidating and
unprovoked behaviour towards activists that were peacefully
advocating in the interests of the people. The political climate in
Tanzania today is tense and creating fear. Fear breeds hate and
revenge, two potentially volatile and explosive emotions. The
common citizens have great difficulty accessing their
constitutional and lawful rights. When they try to exercise their
rights, they are belittled, ignored and often abused. This
environment is not conducive to peace, democracy, and progress.
Real life examples of this process have already occurred in Kilosa
between pastoralists and farmers over land rights and in Zanzibar
when demonstrators clashed with the government. Further tension is
currently brewing elsewhere between farmers and pastoralists
because of unresolved land issues. How far will this go? How many
more people will have to die senselessly? The civil society in
Tanzania, unlike the political parties, are not interested in, nor
do they seek power as an end. We seek justice and fairness, for if
there is no justice there can be no peace. In a true democracy,
the government cannot make itself accountable. It has to be made
accountable by an informed, active and vibrant civil society.
We are all actors in our own destiny and each of us government,
NGOs, community groups, the business sector, private citizens and
the media has a role to play in directing the future. The media
is an especially powerful tool for shaping beliefs, influencing
policy and guiding change. As such, TANGO calls upon the members of
the media to work in partnership and cooperation with the civil
society organizations in being the watchdogs of the government and
ensuring that government serves the people in a transparent, open
way. We do not suggest that we become enemies of the state, but
rather that we act as custodians of peace and justice. We must act
with integrity and courage, for it is better to have one brave
enemy that can tell the truth than to have 20 hypocritical friends
that can lead you to wrong decisions.
We join all those who are calling upon the President to uphold the
democratic principles of our country and form an independent
commission of participants from the government, civil society, the
business sector, and private citizens to:
- provide information that the masses need without fear or favour;
- work together to resolve current tension, misunderstandings and
mistrust; and
- develop a common understanding of democracy, good governance and
the rule of good law.
We must take care not to allow those acting against the interests
of the state to hide themselves and their actions by manipulating
the existing political tensions and playing political parties off
against one another. We all want the same things; a principled debt
cancellation, sustainable development for our people, and a fair
economic deal for Tanzania. For the love of our country, let's
respect and celebrate our differences in a civilized way.
Marie Shaba
Chairperson, TANGO
This material is being reposted for wider distribution by the
Africa Policy Information Center (APIC). APIC provides
accessible information and analysis in order to promote U.S.
and international policies toward Africa that advance economic,
political and social justice and the full spectrum of human rights.
|