Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central Afr. Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo (Kinshasa)
C�te d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
São Tomé
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Western Sahara
Zambia
Zimbabwe
|
Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!
Print this page
Note: This document is from the archive of the Africa Policy E-Journal, published
by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC) from 1995 to 2001 and by Africa Action
from 2001 to 2003. APIC was merged into Africa Action in 2001. Please note that many outdated links in this archived
document may not work.
|
Africa: Economic Trends Mixed
AFRICA ACTION
Africa Policy E-Journal
July 30, 2003 (030730)
Africa: Economic Trends Mixed
(Reposted from sources cited below)
The Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), releasing its annual
Economic Report on Africa today, painted a sobering picture of
slowed growth rates for 2002 and "mixed" prospects for 2003, while
citing successes in some countries. In addition to a continent-wide
review, the report also contains detailed studies of Mauritius,
Rwanda, Ghana, Gabon, Egypt, Mozambique and Uganda
The policy analyses and prescriptions in the report, prepared by
ECA economists, are nuanced, broadly endorsing market
liberalization but also more equitable poverty reduction strategies
and accountability from donors as well as recipient governments. It
is critical of both African governments and donors for not
meeting commitments. It also critiques rich countries for
undermining development by maintaining high subsidies for their own
agricultural production while continuing to press African countries
to further open their markets.
This posting contains the ECA press release announcing the report,
and very brief excerpts from chapter 1 on the economic situation in
2002 and 2003. Despite its generally cautious language, the
report's detailed analyses also contain some sharp critiques of
current practices and innovative suggestions for incremental
changes in particular policy areas. One or more future E-Journal
postings will include additional brief excerpts from the
book-length report,The full report is available now in PDF format
on the ECA website at http://www.uneca.org/era2003
+++++++++++++++++end summary/introduction+++++++++++++++++++++++
ECA Press Release No. 11/2003
TOP AFRICAN PERFORMERS NAMED IN LATEST ECONOMIC REPORT
Addis Ababa, 30 July (ECA) -- African countries that have made the
most progress in putting in place the right policies to reduce
poverty top the rankings in the latest Economic Report on Africa
(ERA 2003), the annual Economic Commission for Africa (ECA)
flagship publication launched today.
The report, titled 'Accelerating the Pace of Development', examines
how Africa can achieve growth rates necessary to attain the
Millennium Development Goals. It ranks African countries based on
the performance of macroeconomic, poverty reduction, and
institution building policies, using an ECA-designed Expanded
Policy Stance Index.
Botswana, South Africa, Mauritius, Namibia, and Tunisia rank
highest, in that order, while the Republic of Congo is at the
bottom followed by Zimbabwe, Chad, Guinea and Nigeria. The top
performers have lower foreign debt, lower budget deficits, and
lower interest rates. Market liberalization is more advanced in
these countries, with few policy reversals; legal systems are more
effective; infrastructure is of higher and more reliable quality
and access is better; and pro-poor policies are more effective. The
bottom five fare poorly on all these indicators.
The Report reveals that Africa's real GDP growth rate fell to 3.2%
in 2002 from 4.3% in 2001, implying that only 5 of Africa's 53
countries achieved the 7% growth rate required to meet the
Millennium Development Goals, 43 registered positive but below 7%
growth rates, and 5 registered negative growth rates.
Seven countries -- Mauritius, Rwanda, Ghana, Gabon, Egypt,
Mozambique and Uganda -- are subjected to in-depth study. The
findings show that African governments are faced with four key
challenges in accelerating the pace of development: escaping
poverty; achieving fiscal sustainability to exit aid dependence;
energizing African bureaucracies and moving to mutual
accountability and coherence.
According to the Report, the outlook for Africa in 2003 is mixed,
with growth expected to rebound modestly to 4.2%. Downside risks
stem from the deteriorating political and economic situation in
Zimbabwe and Liberia, with possible contagious effects in the
western and southern sub regions. Renewed flooding and drought in
various parts of the continent, especially in the Horn of Africa
and the southern region, may affect agricultural production in
2003.
The failure of the Doha Development Round of multilateral trade
negotiations to provide immediate duty-free and quota-free market
access to the poorest countries hampers Africa's exports. At the
same time, the US decision to introduce a six-year $51.7 billion
farm bill boosting crop and dairy subsidies will reduce
agricultural prices, making it difficult for small African
countries to compete.
Yet despite the weak performance, African countries continued to
strengthen their macroeconomic fundamentals and intensify their
focus on reducing poverty and attracting domestic and foreign
investment.
(END)
For more information on ERA 2003,
please contact Benedicte Walter,
Tel +251-1-44-32-28, fax +251-1-51 22 33, e-mail: [email protected]
or
visit the ERA 2003 website at http://www.uneca.org/era2003 for the
full report in pdf, as well as the Media Kit, which includes
backgrounders on each of the country studies.
To interview members of the ERA 2003 team listed below, please call
+251-1-51-10-56:
Overall English Spokespersons:
Patrick Asea, Director, Economic and Social Policy Division,
e-mail: [email protected]
Shamika Sirimanne, Senior Economist and ERA Team leader, e-mail:
[email protected]
Overall French spokesperson:
Oliver Paddison, Economist, e-mail: [email protected]
For specific chapters:
Uganda: Shamika Sirimanne, Senior Economist, e-mail:
[email protected]
Rwanda: Niall Kishtainy, Economist, e-mail: [email protected]
Mozambique: Kwabia Boateng, Senior Economist, e-mail:
[email protected]
Ghana: Patrick Asea, Director, e-mail: [email protected]
Egypt: Niall Kishtainy, Economist, e-mail: [email protected]
Gabon: Jean K. Thisen, Senior Economist, e-mail: [email protected]
Mauritius: Shamika Sirimanne, Senior Economist, e-mail:
[email protected]
Issued by the ECA Communication Team
P.O. Box 3001
Addis Ababa
Ethiopia
Tel: +251-1-51 58 26
Fax: +251-1-51 03 65
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: www.uneca.org
Excerpts from Chapter 1: Recent Economic Trenda in Africa and
Prospects for 2003
Recent economic developments in Africa
Of the 53 countries in Africa, only 5 achieved the 7% growth rate
in 2002 required to meet the Millennium Development Goals, 43 had
growth below 7%, and 5 registered negative growth. For the region
as a whole, real GDP grew 3.2% in 2002, compared with 4.3% in 2001.
Growth slows in regional powerhouses
The slowdown in regional growth is due to slower growth in four of
the five largest economies in the region: Algeria, Egypt, Morocco,
and Nigeria.
- In Algeria the decline from 5% in 2001 to 2.7% in 2002, despite
an increase in oil prices, reflects political and religious
tensions, flooding in the east, and weak competitiveness in the
industrial sector.
- In Egypt the decline from 3.5% to 3% is due primarily to higher
domestic interest rates, sluggish private sector growth, regional
insecurity, and lack of political will by the government to
implement far-reaching economic and social reforms, such as
privatization and trade liberalization.
- In Morocco the decline from 6.5% to 4.3% was due to weak domestic
demand and reduced tourism.
- In Nigeria growth declined from 4% to 2.6%, reflecting the
combined effect of political risk and deteriorating economic
fundamentals emanating from weak fiscal behaviour. 1990 2000
South Africa, which accounts for about 35% of the GDP of the five
largest economies in Africa, grew 3% in 2002, up from 2.5% in 2001.
This weak performance despite recent increases in the prices of its
export commodities, particularly gold, is due in part to sluggish
growth in the euro area. In addition, the appreciation of the rand
against the dollar in the second and third quarters reduced the
competitiveness of South African exports. And the South African
Reserve Bank tightened monetary policy on a number of occasions to
reduce inflationary pressures.
Southern Africa grew faster than the other subregions
With the exception of Southern Africa, growth slipped in all
subregions by 3 percentage points in the north, 0.4 in the west,
0.5 in the east, and 1.5 in the centre.
- In North Africa the decline reflects heightened political tension
in the Middle East and the subdued growth in the euro area, a major
trading partner.
- In West Africa the decline is due in part to slower growth in
Nigeria the largest economy in the subregion from 4% in 2001 to
2.6% in 2002. Reductions in the pace of economic activity in
Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, Niger, Senegal, and Sierra Leone also
contributed.
- In East Africa a 3.5% decline in Madagascar, coupled with modest
declines in Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Tanzania,
contributed to the slowdown.
- In Central Africa the slowdown is due largely to declines in
Equatorial Guinea (from 66.1% to 24.4%), Congo (from 2.9% to 1.7%),
and Cameroon (from 5.2% to 4.9%). For the second year in a row,
Equatorial Guinea is the fastest growing economy in Africa, thanks
to oil and gas.
- In Southern Africa growth increased from 2.4% in 2001 to 3.3% in
2002, largely reflecting improvements in South Africa, Angola,
Lesotho, and Namibia.
Agriculture and food security
Since 2000 there has been a general deterioration in agriculture,
reflecting the slowdown in global economic activity and poor
weather. Estimates for 2001 suggest that agricultural production
grew by a meager 0.8% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding South
Africa). Although this is better than the 0.3% decline in 2000, it
is far below the sector's average growth of 3.9% in 1992-96.
In 2002 unfavourable weather created severe problems. In Kenya
flooding due to heavy rains affected about 30,000 people. In
Senegal flooding in February killed 500,000 livestock, destroyed
20,000 homes, and damaged 2,500 hectares of crops. In Algeria
agricultural output fell 3.2% in 2002, partly because of flooding
in the east in July and August. In Botswana, Ethiopia, Lesotho,
Malawi, Mauritania, Namibia, Niger, Swaziland,Tunisia, Zambia, and
Zimbabwe drought and generally dry conditions reduced agricultural
production.Tunisia's agricultural output declined 14% in 2002.
Despite the poor weather in some parts of the region, agricultural
production was expected to grow in 2002 by 11% in Morocco, 5.1% in
Uganda, 4.1% in Ghana, 4.0% in Nigeria, 3.4% in Egypt, 3.5% in
Cameroon, 3.2% in South Africa, and 2.5% in Cote d'Ivoire.
Food insecurity-the lack of access by an individual or a group of
individuals to enough food for an active, healthy life-is becoming
a serious development challenge in the Sahel as well as in parts of
eastern and southern Africa. In Ethiopia close to a quarter of the
population faces the risk of famine and urgently needs food aid. In
Zimbabwe 49% of the population requires emergency food aid, in
Lesotho 30%, in Malawi 29%, in Zambia 26%, and in Swaziland 24%.
Declining productivity in agriculture and severe drought have
reduced food security in Zimbabwe. After independence and several
land reform attempts, most of the large commercial farms were still
held by whites, then 1% of the population. In 2001 02 much of the
commercial farmland was forcibly resettled, but having
inexperienced farmers on commercial land hurt agricultural
production.
Medium-term prospects - mixed
In the near term, growth prospects for African countries will
depend mainly on the strength of recovery in global economic
activity, the outlook for commodity prices, the progress in
reducing political and armed conflicts, and the commitment of
African leaders to macroeconomic stability and the principles of
good governance.
Modest improvement in growth in 2003
Economic growth is expected to increase from 3.2% in 2002 to 4.2%
in 2003, driven mainly by recent economic and political events in
and outside Africa:
- An increase in peace agreements and a reduction in armed
conflicts: consider the ceasefire in Angola following the death of
the UNITA rebel leader, Jonas Savimbi; the tentative peace in West
Africa between Liberia and Sierra Leone; the cessation of
hostilities in the Horn of Africa between Eritrea and Ethiopia; the
July 2002 peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of Congo
and Rwanda in Pretoria; and the recent resumption of peace talks
between the Sudanese government and the rebel Sudan People's
Liberation Army (SPLA). The cessation of hostilities in these
countries is expected to result in a redirection of military
spending towards economic and social projects that will
reinvigorate growth.
- An increase in the number of African countries eligible for debt
relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative.
This is expected to free up resources for social expenditures
directed at vulnerable groups and boost economic activity.
- The bottoming out of the global slowdown. An improvement in
economic activity should be expected in most of the world's regions
in the third quarter of 2003, spurring economic activity in Africa
through increased aid, trade, and foreign investment. In the OECD
area growth is expected to increase from 1.5% in 2002 to 2.2% in
2003, in the United States from 2.3% to 2.6%, and in the European
Union from 0.9% to 1.9%. Japan is expected to move from a negative
growth rate of 0.7% in 2002 to a positive growth rate of 0.8% in
2003.
- The decision by six West African countries to form a monetary
union in 2005.The attempts by governments to meet the convergence
criteria are likely to improve the macroeconomic policy environment
in the subregion, boosting future growth.
- The events of September 11, 2001, and the resulting international
war against terrorism. Economic effects for Africa will be positive
to the extent that the activities of militant groups are checked in
unstable African countries and that western nations become more
involved in the economic and political development of African
nations to discourage them from providing safe-havens to
terrorists.There are already indications that this is happening.
Africa featured prominently on the agenda of the last G-8 Summit in
Kananaskis, Canada. And several advanced countries have promised to
support development efforts in Africa.
The pace of economic activity is expected to improve next year in
all five subregions. In 2003 growth is projected to be 4.9% in
North Africa, 4.4% in East and Central Africa, 3.6% in Southern
Africa, and 3.3% in West Africa. North Africa is projected to have
the highest growth rate in the region, driven by strong growth in
Algeria (5.9%), Sudan (5.7%), Tunisia (5.5%), and Egypt (4.6%).
East Africa is projected to have the second highest growth rate in
the region, driven by strong growth in Rwanda (6.5%), Uganda (6%),
Madagascar (5.5%), Tanzania (5.2%), and the Democratic Republic of
Congo (3.8%).
All West African countries-except Cote d'Ivoire, Liberia,
Guinea-Bissau, and Sierra Leone-are projected to have growth of
3.0% or more in 2003, underpinned in part by an expected
improvement in the prices of key commodities exported by the
subregion - notably gold, oil, and cocoa. Guinea Bissau will grow
by a meager 1.5%, and Liberia by 1.6%. Economic activity is
expected to pick up in Nigeria, with growth projected at 3.0%.
Underpinning the improvement would be an increase in oil revenue if
OPEC increases its oil quota.Nigeria has already indicated that it
would ask for an increase in its quota, likely to be approved if
political tensions between the United States and Iraq continue
unabated.
In Southern Africa growth is expected to increase from 3.3% in 2002
to 3.6% in 2003 reflecting improvements in the prices of key export
commodities gold, oil, diamonds, and copper. Zimbabwe is expected
to have a negative growth rate ( 4.6%), explained in part by the
political and economic crisis in the country.With an expected
growth rate of 10.2% Mozambique will be the fastest growing economy
in the subregion, thanks to sound macroeconomic policies and funds
from debt relief under the HIPC Initiative. Because of the
likelihood that gold and diamond prices will increase, growth is
expected to rise in South Africa from 3.0% in 2002 to 3.3% in 2003.
With Equatorial Guinea continuing to have very impressive growth of
21.7% and with strong growth in Cameroon and S o Tom� and Principe,
the Central African subregion is expected to have a slight boost in
growth from 4.0% in 2002 to 4.4% in 2003.
Risks and uncertainties
As usual, there are some downside risks to the realization of the
projected growth rate for Africa:
- The deteriorating political and economic situation in Zimbabwe
and Cote d'Ivoire.
- Renewed incidents of flooding and drought in various parts of the
continent, especially in the Horn of Africa and the Southern
African region.
- The decision by U.S. President Bush in May 2002 to introduce a
six-year $51.7 billion farm law, boosting crop and dairy subsidies
by 67%. There is the concern that the subsidy will lead to lower
prices for agricultural products, making it difficult for small
African countries to compete on the world market.
- Inflationary pressures in two of the five big economies in Africa
South Africa and Nigeria as well as in countries such as Angola,
Zimbabwe, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Malawi would reduce
the ability of the monetary authorities to stimulate the economy.
- The high probability of an El Ni�o phenomenon in 2003 as
suggested by the International Research Institute for Climate
Prediction and the associated deterioration of global weather
conditions.
In sum, the mixed prospects for Africa in the medium term will be
influenced largely by the strength of the recovery in global
economic activity, developments in commodity markets, progress in
reducing regional insecurity, adoption of sound macroeconomic
policies and the principles of good governance, and the ability and
willingness of African leaders to intensify much-needed economic
and social reforms.
+++++++++++++++++++++Document Profile+++++++++++++++++++++
Date distributed (ymd): 030730
Region: Continent-Wide
Issue Areas: +economy/development+ +security/peace+
The Africa Action E-Journal is a free information service
provided by Africa Action, including both original
commentary and reposted documents. Africa Action provides this
information and analysis in order to promote U.S. and
international policies toward Africa that advance economic,
political and social justice and the full spectrum of
human rights.
|