Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central Afr. Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo (Kinshasa)
C�te d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
São Tomé
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Western Sahara
Zambia
Zimbabwe
|
Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!
| on your newsreader!
Print this page
Africa: Global Economic Crisis, 1
AfricaFocus Bulletin
Apr 2, 2009 (090402)
(Reposted from sources cited below)
Editor's Note
"There is a need for developing countries to examine the options
for national policy on each aspect of the economic crisis and to
seek the appropriate policies. However, only some policy measures
can be taken at national level, especially if the country is too
small to rely on the boosting of domestic-led growth.
Regional-level measures are important. And most critical are the
reforms, actions and cooperative measures required at the
international level." - Martin Khor, South Centre
This AfricaFocus Bulletin, containing the full statement by Martin
Khor, is the first in a series of three posted today. It is
available on the web at http://www.africafocus.org/docs09/gec0904a.php The other two
Bulletins in this series are available at http://www.africafocus.org/docs09/gec0904b.php (also distributed by e-mail) and http://www.africafocus.org/docs09/gec0904c.php (only on
the web, with the full text of the Commission of Experts
recommendation.
For previous AfricaFocus Bulletins on related issues, see
http://www.africafocus.org/econexp.php
++++++++++++++++++++++end editor's note+++++++++++++++++++++++
Statement by the South Centre
Statement at the UN General Assembly Extraordinary Thematic
Dialogue on The World Financial And Economic Crisis And Its Impact
On Development
By Martin Khor, Executive Director, South Centre
New York, 25 March 2009
http://www.southcentre.org/
- The extraordinarily serious global economic crisis has its
origins in the developed countries. Developing countries are not
responsible, but they are severely affected, and in ways that are
worse than the developed countries, as they also lack the means to
counter the effects.
- Developing countries are only in the past few months beginning
to feel the effects of the crisis, due to the lag time in
transmission. The crisis will certainly last longer than
originally expected, and then it may take even more time before a
full recovery.
- There is thus growing anxiety in the developing world. When he
met the British Prime Minister Mr. Gordon Brown, last week, as
part of the preparation for the G20 Summit, the Ethiopian Prime
Minister Mr. Meles Zenawi warned that African countries could face
political chaos if the recession hits at full force. In developed
countries such as Britain, the worst problem being faced in the
downturn was unemployment. But in Africa, the recession means that
�people who were getting some food would cease to get it and
instead of beng unemployed they would die�, said Mr. Zenawi, as
quoted in the Financial Times.
- The developing countries are being hit through two transmission
levels - trade and finance. The first transmission channel is
through trade. There has been a sudden and steep fall in
manufacturing exports, the fall being 30 to 50% in many Asian
countries. Then there is the fall in demand, prices and export
earnings for commodities, affecting especially low-income
commodity-dependent countries. On 17 March, The Economist's
commodity-price dollar index for all items had fallen by 40%
compared to a year ago (with declines of 29% for food, 44% for
non-food agriculture products and 56% for metals). Earnings from
services are also falling, for example in tourism (in the
Caribbean tourist arrivals are expected to fall by one third this
season) and migrant workers' remittances (a 6% drop is estimated
by the World Bank for 2009)..
- The second transmission channel is through finance. There is a
rapid decline of bank loans to developing countries, whose
companies may find it difficult to roll the many hundreds of
billions of dollars of foreign loans due this year. There is a
reversal of portfolio investment into developing countries, from
large inflows in recent years to a sudden huge exit. Net capital
flows to emerging markets fell from $929 billion in 2007 to $466
billion in 2008 and will fall further to $165 billion in 2009,
according to the estimates by Institute of International Finance.
Even FDI is rapidly slowing down because of difficulties in access
to credit and economic contraction. If the past record is a guide,
aid flows can also be seriously affected in the near future. Trade
financing has also been affected by risk aversion, and is choking
trade flows; a shortfall of $25 billion in trade financing was
reported at a recent WTO meeting.
- These trade and financial shocks are leading to stresses on the
overall balance of payments, with a fall in foreign reserves, and
a depreciation of the local currency in some countries. All these
together threaten developing countries' ability to service their
external debt and avoid a debt default situation. There are already
10 countries that have had to go to the IMF for emergency loans
and many other countries are likely to be lining up in the near
future.
- All of the above are causing a stress on the real economy, with
declines in GNP and industrial output, a reversal in poverty
eradication and a slowdown in social development, as governments
face reduced revenues and budgetary stress. Most developing
countries are constrained from taking the fiscal expansion
measures similar to those of developed countries.
- There is a need for developing countries to examine the options
for national policy on each aspect of the economic crisis and to
seek the appropriate policies. However, only some policy measures
can be taken at national level, especially if the country is too
small to rely on the boosting of domestic-led growth.
Regional-level measures are important. And most critical are the
reforms, actions and cooperative measures required at the
international level.
- The South Centre views the two issues of reform and
international actions needed to counter the recession from the
perspective of the problems and interests of the developing
countries. What are the priority issues for the developing
countries, on which action is urgently required?
- Among the priorities for the South are (1) establishing an
international system that fosters financial stability for
developing countries; (2) having access to adequate and stable
financial resources, as private flows and exports decline;
(3) avoidance of financial and debt crises and proper management
of crises if they occur; (4) unimpaired access to markets for
goods and services; (5) avoiding collateral damage from policies
taken by developed countries in response to the crisis; (6)
formulating policies for the short and long term for recovery and
development, and being able to maintain and expand policy space to
implement these policies.
- There is need to review and reform the international financial
and economic systems to ensure the problems that led to the crisis
are not repeated and that the international system does not
prevent but positively encourages developing countries to have the
adequate policy space to deal with the crisis nationally.
- There are dangers that some crisis measures taken by developed
countries may have adverse effects on the South, and thus a need
to prevent or offset these actions. For example, developed
countries' agriculture subsidies used to be the main distortion in
world trade but these are now accompanied by huge subsidies to
financial institutions and emerging subsidies to manufacturing
(the auto industry). Developing countries lack funds to match
these subsidies; they should be allowed to take measures to prevent
subsidised service providers like banks and subsidised goods from
overwhelming their domestic markets. In the area of tariffs,
developing countries should be allowed to exercise their right to
use the policy space to raise their applied tariff if it is below
the bound tariff. A moratorium against raising applied tariffs
would be imbalanced because there is little difference between the
applied and bound rates in developed countries, unlike the
developing countries.
- Private investors and public agencies in some developing
countries invested in or lent to private and public institutions
in developed countries. Developed countries' governments should
assure that the assets of developing countries are protected.
Pressures from interest groups that exclude developing countries'
assets or loans from bailout plans (for example the suggestion
that AIG should only honour claims from nationally-owned
institutions) should be resisted.
- New forms of trade protection that affect developing countries
should not be introduced. The fiscal stimulus programmes should
not exclude goods and services from developing countries, as has
happened with the Buy American clause in the recent US stimulus
package. Developed countries are mainly exempted from the clause
due to their membership of the WTO plurilateral procurement
agreement, of which most developing countries are not members.
There is also need to guard against a new trade protectionist
element being proposed in the climate policies and legislation of
some developed countries; if this is introduced, it could have a
further adverse effect on developing countries� exports and add
more stress in this crisis period.
- A high priority for developing countries is to establish
international measures to foster financial stability and avoid
activities driven by speculation. The crisis originated from
banking deregulation and excessive liquidity creation, causing
speculation to be rife in capital and currency markets. Developing
countries have been hit by these speculative activities leading to
violent fluctuations in capital flows. But because of highly
costly self-insurance taken in large stock of reserves, these
swings have not created the kind of dislocations seen in 1997 in
Asia. An important part of the solution is to reinstall firewalls
and regulations to avoid speculative capital flows unrelated to
real economic activities (trade and investment) and to establish a
system of currency exchange where currency rates reflect
underlying fundamentals. This should be a major priority in the
reform of the international financial architecture.
- In the absence of reform and an international system regulating
these flows, developing countries must have the policy space and
be allowed to undertake national policy measures to regulate
capital flows and to defend themselves from speculation. However
the required policy space to take the required measures is hindered
by (1) IMF-World Bank conditionality that mandates an open capital
account; (2) Many North-South free trade agreements that (a)
mandate the free and unregulated inflow and outflow of funds; (b)
liberalisation of financial services, including the entry of
foreign institutions for "new financial instruments"; (c)
liberalisation and deregulation of investments. These barriers
(the loan conditionality and the FTA provisions) to the required
regulation should be reviewed. Existing FTAs should be reviewed to
consider amending clauses that prevent the required regulation.
Current negotiations on FTAs such as the EPAs between the EU and
the African and Pacific countries should fully take this into
account.
- A major plank of the new financial architecture is the reform
of the IMF. Its policy conditionalities have previously not been
appropriate in assisting developing countries deal with crises.
These include: (1) the policy of an open capital account system,
that deregulates capital flows (increasing financial
vulnerability) and discourages or prevents capital controls over
inflows and outflows; (2) pro-cyclical monetary and fiscal policies
that have magnified contractionary conditions; (3) trade policy
linked to extreme liberalisation of imports and industrial policy
based on non-state intervention, which have damaged domestic
agriculture and industry in many developing countries. A
preliminary review of recent crisis loans to 10 countries
(including some developing countries) by the IMF show that
contractionary financial and fiscal policies (such as a
significant increase in interest rates, and a reduction of
government spending) are still maintained as part of the loan
conditions.
- A reform of the IMF is thus crucial. Without the reform, it is
premature to expand its resources. The IMF should not impose or
promote an open capital account or prevent regulation of capital
flows. It should not deal with trade and industrial policies and
other development-related policies. The reform process should lead
to its creditor role being confined to providing short-term loans
to countries to deal with temporary balance of payments
difficulties. In that area, its policies should be counter-cyclical
and not pro-cyclical. Countries should not be requested to provide
loans to the IMF to augment its resources because this would
compromise the ability of the IMF to carry out its surveillance
function and to discipline the policies of countries that provide
the loans. It can obtain resources from the market or from the
issuance of SDRs, instead of obtaining loans from governments. The
imbalances in the system of governance, with its present serious
imbalance in voting rights and decision-making, should also be
addressed. [Several of these points in this and the following
paragraphs are in Yilmaz Akyuz, "Key issues in the reform of the
international financial architecture"; and "The IMF is back in
business - as usual?"]
- One major source of financial instability is that the
international reserve currency is the currency of a single country
(the United States). This causes instability as availability of
reserves for the world economy depends on the reserve currency
country (the US) having growing current account deficits. This
problem is worsened under the present crisis because of : (a) the
absence of multilateral discipline over exchange rate and
macroeconomic policies of the US; (b) developing countries'
increased vulnerability to fluctuations in capital flows and
exchange rates; (c) pro-cyclical behaviour of financial markets;
(d) developing countries holding large stocks of foreign reserves
at very high costs. As an alternative, an international reserves
system based on the SDRs could be established. The IMF could
distribute SDRs to itself to make it available to members, and
there should be greater automaticity in access to it.
- The new financial architecture should include establishment of
a multilateral fund or funds. This could be similar to the two oil
facilities set up in the 1970s to assist countries cope with the
oil price increases and to prevent a global recession. The fund can
assist developing countries counter the recession and to offset the
multiple losses of financing caused by reduced exports, migrant
remittances, service payments, loans, investments, trade
financing, etc. The shortfall facing developing countries may total
many hundreds of billions of dollars a year. The fund should thus
be of a major amount. The channels of funding and its multiple
uses should be determined together by the international community.
- Developing countries should also be encouraged to explore and
expand regional financial cooperation. Examples of this are the
Chiang Mai Initiative and its extension in Asia, and the Bank of
the South in Latin America.
- The new financial architecture should also deal with the threat
of new debt crises facing developing countries. The current
account and overall balance of payments of many developing
countries and their foreign reserves are or will be coming under
increasing stress, due to a crisis that was not of their doing. The
reform process should as a priority establish an international
system of debt standstill and debt workout for countries that face
debt servicing difficulties. Proposals on this (which originated at
UNCTAD) had been rather extensively discussed, including at the
IMF, but did not lead to any conclusions. Given the present
crisis, this should again be a priority proposal. A new round of
debt elimination and debt relief should also be looked at now.
- For many of the poorer countries, dependence on commodities has
revived as a serious problem because the positive conditions and
high prices of the past several years have vanished. The
stabilisation of commodity prices and fair remuneration to
producing countries has thus become a priority crisis issue for
developing countries. International cooperation on resolving
commodity issues should thus be on the reform agenda.
- The crisis provides an opportunity to address the deficits and
imbalances in the governance of global finance and economic
issues. The United Nations used to play a central role in policy
formulation and in reaching and implementing agreements. However
in recent years, too much faith and power had been given instead to
the markets and to international financial institutions which
supported the drive towards "marketisation" and
"financialisation." At the national level, in developed countries
in the centre of the storm, the pendulum has swung, with the
leadership and interventionist role of the state being emphasised.
The international counterpart of this national-level development
should be the strengthening of the role of the United Nations,
including its General Assembly and its economic arms, particularly
ECOSOC. Greater authority provided to a strengthened and more
effective UN should be a crucial element of the new global
economic architecture.
- The UN General Assembly high-level conference in June is an
important opportunity for discussion and follow-up actions on the
wide range of issues of the crisis and how it affects development,
and the remedies required. The South Centre is willing to
contribute to the success of this very important event.
AfricaFocus Bulletin is an independent electronic publication
providing reposted commentary and analysis on African issues, with
a particular focus on U.S. and international policies. AfricaFocus
Bulletin is edited by William Minter.
AfricaFocus Bulletin can be reached at [email protected]. Please
write to this address to subscribe or unsubscribe to the bulletin,
or to suggest material for inclusion. For more information about
reposted material, please contact directly the original source
mentioned. For a full archive and other resources, see
http://www.africafocus.org
|