Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central Afr. Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo (Kinshasa)
C�te d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
São Tomé
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Western Sahara
Zambia
Zimbabwe
|
Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!
Format for print or mobile
USA/Africa: China, Bolton, and Jimmy Carter
AfricaFocus Bulletin
January 30, 2019 (190130)
(Reposted from sources cited below)
Editor's Note
When National Security Advisor John Bolton presented
the administration´s "New Africa Strategy" at the
conservative Heritage Foundation on December 13, the
Washington Post headlined Bolton´s warning that
�´predatory´ China is outpacing the U.S.
In Africa" (http://tinyurl.com/ydgrr7ep). And, according to the
New York Times, "Bolton Outlines a Strategy for
Africa That�s Really About Countering China"
(http://tinyurl.com/yc73fx9j). But however prominent
the theme of U.S.-China competition in current news,
neither this framework nor any other overarching
theme is likely to prove a reliable guide as either a
description or prescription for actual policy.
In fact, the Trump administration´s Africa policy
will likely continue to be as chaotic as
administration policy more generally, and more of a
continuity with the policy of previous administrations than it appears from the rhetoric
from senior officials. However extreme the
incoherence now, the failure of a single framework to
define policy, as both historians and analysts of
current events can attest, is not an exception but
rather commonplace. Outcomes for specific issues and
countries result from a complex interaction of
causes, including those unrelated to priorities set
from the top.
This AfricaFocus Bulletin contains excerpts from and
links to relevant recent articles illustrating this
point in relation to the US-China rivalry. More
broadly, on economic issues, the joint economic
policy prescriptions advanced not only by the United
States but also by multilateral institutions such as
the European Union, World Bank, and International
Monetary Fund are at least as important as the
bilateral U.S.-China competition. And in confronting
African security crises, country-specific and regionspecific
factors appear to continue to be more
important than the China rivalry in U.S. responses to
cases including the Democratic Republic of the Congo,
Zimbabwe, Nigeria, Western Sahara, Somalia, and the
Sahel.
It is far beyond the scope of one Bulletin to delve
into U.S. security policy in these highly diverse
contexts, in which policies of African and European
governments, advocacy by human rights and
humanitarian organizations, the United Nations, and
disagreements within the U.S. Government all play a
role. But one useful general guide is to acknowledge
that policy is shaped both by general paradigms as
well as particular circumstances. In the security
realm, despite Bolton, US-China competition is still
far lower in impact on actual policy than the
overarching themes of counter-terrorism and
international response to instability.
Another AfricaFocus Bulletin sent out today, and
available on the web at http://www.africafocus.org/docs19/usa1901b.php,
features excerpts from Elizabeth Schmidt´s recently
published book on Foreign Intervention in Africa
after the Cold War, containing both overarching
frameworks for analysis and a carefully selected set
of case studies.
For previous AfricaFocus Bulletins on the USA and
Africa, visit http://www.africafocus.org/country/usa-africa.php
For the text of Ambassador Bolton´s speech and other
relevant articles, see
https://allafrica.com/view/group/main/main/id/00065416.html
Remarks by National Security Advisor Ambassador John
R. Bolton on the Trump Administration's New Africa
Strategy, Heritage Foundation, Dec. 13,2018
https://allafrica.com/stories/201812140155.html
State Department, Fact Sheet - President Donald J.
Trump's Africa Strategy Advances Prosperity,
Security, and Stability
https://allafrica.com/stories/201812140153.html
Testimony, Tibor P. Nagy, Jr., Assistant Secretary,
Bureau of African Affairs, House Foreign Affairs
Committee, Washington, DC, December 12, 2018
https://allafrica.com/stories/201812130046.html
For an emphasis not so much on China but on U.S.-
Africa business opportunities, see Anthony Carroll,
"Some Thoughts on President Trump�s Strategy for
Africa," Council on Foreign Relations, Dec. 18, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/yaf58lfn
Contrasting views on China
While Bolton stressed the threat from China, both the
talking points and congressional testimony from the
State Department featured more anodyne and familiar
tropes about �prosperity, security, and stability.�
Assistant Secretary of State Nagy included only one
sentence referring to China: "The Administration will
encourage African leaders to choose sustainable
foreign investments that help states become selfreliant,
unlike those offered by China that impose
undue costs."
And commentators excerpted below took radically
different views on whether the relationship with
China was or should be so polarized. Arthur Herman in
the National Review presented an even more alarmist
take than Bolton himself. But Jimmy Carter in an oped
in the Washington Post stressed that �Africans �
like billions of other people around the world � do
not want to be forced to choose a side.�
John Stremlau, a former official of the Carter Center
and now a professor at the University of the
Witwatersrand, argued at length that �Trump�s Africa
strategy should have cast China as a regional
partner, not a global adversary,�
Two recent articles also point to the complexity of
U.S.-China relations in Africa.
Edward Wong, "Competing Against Chinese Loans, U.S.
Companies Face Long Odds," New York Times, Jan. 13,
2019
http://tinyurl.com/y9bolzrj
Detailed account of how a U.S. company won over
Chinese competitors in a deal for an oil refinery in
Uganda. A reminder that both the U.S. and China,
despite their commitments to renewable energy, are
also investing in the fossil fuel sector in which
short-term benefits for Africa will be quickly
outweighed by long-term damage to the environment and
climate.
Aaron Mehta, �How the US and China collaborated to
get nuclear material out of Nigeria � and away from
terrorist group,� Defensenews.com, Jan. 14, 2019
http://tinyurl.com/ybcqy3ln
Detailed account of how the US, China, and Russia as
well worked with Nigeria to transfer vulnerable
highly enriched uranium (now not needed for civilian
research use) away from a research reactor in Kaduna
back to China for safekeeping.
++++++++++++++++++++++end editor's note+++++++++++++++++
|
The Coming Scramble for Africa
By Arthur L. Herman
National Review, December 26, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/yabaz2lp
China, and Russia to a degree, are ahead of the game,
but the U.S. has the advantage going forward.
In the 19th century, Europe�s great powers were
caught up in what historians have dubbed �the
scramble for Africa,� as Britain, France, Germany,
and Italy competed with one other to establish
colonies and control over the so-called Dark
Continent � a competition that increased
international tensions and ultimately helped to set
the stage for the First World War.
Today a new scramble is underway, pitting the United
States and China and, to a lesser degree, Russia
against one other as they try to coax into their
respective camps the new Africa that�s emerging in
the 21st century.
At stake are Africa�s rich natural resources, rapidly
growing markets, and political and military influence
over the planet�s Southern Hemisphere � and a major
portion of the world�s population. This scramble will
do much to shape the 21st century, just as the
earlier scramble shaped the 19th. It will also become
a major epicenter for the ongoing competition between
the U.S. and China for economic and strategic
leadership.
Fortunately, the Trump administration understands the
stakes involved. Last week National Security Adviser
John Bolton gave a speech unveiling the
administration�s new Africa strategy. Unfortunately
for the U.S., China has a big lead in this
competition, and making up the difference won�t be
easy, even though it will have to be a critical part
of America�s 21st-century agenda.
But America has one clear advantage going forward.
Unlike the last scramble for Africa, in the 19th
century, when all the participants wound up being
imperialist bad actors, this scramble has two very
bad actors, Russia and China, and one clearly good
guy ready to ride to the rescue � namely, the U.S.
While China�s efforts in Africa have been brutal and
neo-colonialist in the extreme, we can, as Bolton
indicated in his speech, show sub-Saharan Africa�s 49
countries how to preserve their independence and
autonomy and become part of the modern economic order
in ways that benefit their people and increase their
prosperity and security � as well as the prosperity
and security of the United States.
Underlying all this is a fundamental reality: Africa
in the 21st century is going to be the next frontier
of globalization. It contains more than 30 percent of
world�s hydrocarbon reserves and minerals, including
rare earths essential for defense needs, and is
experiencing the world�s biggest population
explosion.
The United Nations estimates that Nigeria by 2050
will be the third-most populous country, after China
and India, and that Africa�s population as a whole
will surpass China�s by 2100. Of the world�s 21 most
�high fertility� nations � i.e., with the highest
potential for fast population growth � 19 are in
Africa.
Nor is Africa the economic basket case it once was.
According to the African Development Bank, subSaharan
Africa is poised to be the second-fastestgrowing
economy in the world, with a growth rate of
3.1 percent in 2018 and a projected growth rate of
3.6 percent in 2019�20. All this adds up to a
continent ready and eager to join the world�s
economic order.
Still, it�s easy to see why Africa slipped off
America�s strategic radar screen. Decades of poverty
and corruption have made Africa seem like the world�s
incurable basket case, an impression that the
unfolding AIDS crisis in the 1990s only reinforced.
The Obama years were wasted in terms of engagement in
Africa. While Obama made highly publicized trips to
Africa and paid lip service to the idea of helping
sub-Saharan Africa escape from poverty and join the
modern world, two predators took advantage of U.S.
passivity to plant themselves on the continent. The
first was radical Islam and Boko Haram. The other was
China.
While the U.S. and the rest of the West have largely
ignored Africa during the past two decades, China has
made it an economic and strategic priority. Beijing
sees it as the perfect hunting ground for securing
raw materials, for overseas business investment, and
above all for expanding China�s geopolitical
influence, as part of a grand strategy for replacing
the U.S. as the leading global hegemon.
By 2015 trade between China and Africa was close to
$300 billion. It now tops half a trillion dollars.
(By contrast, U.S. trade with Arica is barely $5
billion, and has been declining since 2011.) Right
now China has more than 3,000 infrastructure projects
underway across the continent and has handed out more
than $60 billion in commercial loans. But none of it,
especially the loans, comes without strings attached.
Hungry for economic opportunity, and hungry for cash,
one African country after another has willingly
turned itself into a Chinese dependency.
Dictatorships including those in Ethiopia and Ghana
have accepted Chinese help in erecting their own
versions of the Great Firewall, in order to gain
control of the Internet inside their borders, while
adopting the technologies of China�s high-tech police
state. Others fell for China�s offer of loans to
support those infrastructure projects and soon found
themselves in debt traps that they couldn�t escape �
and that China is able to use to wield political
influence.
Zambia is a perfect example. Today it finds itself in
debt to China in the amount of $6�10 billion � nearly
a third of its total GPD. Chinese control over the
country�s economy has put Zambia in a stranglehold.
As one former Zambian prime minister put it,
�European colonial exploitation in comparison with
Chinese exploitation appears benign,� the latter
being �focused on taking out of Africa as much as can
be taken out, without any regard for the welfare of
the local people.� Several other African countries,
including Rwanda and Ghana, could make the same
claim.
China�s growing influence has its military side as
well. China�s decision in 2017 to build a military
and naval base in Djibouti on the Horn of Africa has
been a geopolitical game-changer, given its proximity
to the U.S. base at Camp Lemonnier. The Djibouti base
location gives China�s new aircraft carriers a place
to rest and refit � and to project Chinese power
where no one ten or 20 years ago imagined it
possible.
Bolton in his speech mentioned both Zambia and
Djibouti, in explaining why America needs a new
proactive policy toward Africa, one that emphasizes
democracy, economic prosperity, and, above all,
political autonomy in face of China�s neo-colonialist
ambitions. While not forgetting the importance of the
war on radical Islam in Africa � which, we should
remember, the Obamas chose to fight largely with
hashtags � Bolton and the Trump administration
recognize that the top priority there is to counter
Russian and Chinese influence across the continent.
(China�s predatory practices get plenty of mention,
but Bolton also pointed out that Russia �continues to
sell arms and energy in exchange for votes at the
United Nations � votes that keep strongmen in power,
undermine peace and security, and run counter to the
best interests of the African people.�)
One component of the new American strategy is to look
for ways to increase investment by U.S. companies in
a broad range of industries, from energy and minerals
to telecommunications and health care. Another
component, just as important, of the the new U.S.
strategy is to cut and eliminate U.S. aid that only
strengthens corruption and economic dependence.
Between 1995 and 2006, for example, U.S. government
aid to Africa was roughly equal to the amount of
assistance provided by all other donors combined �
with little or no benefit for the intended
recipients, or for the U.S. The new Trump policy will
aim to ensure, instead, according to Bolton, �that
ALL aid to the region � whether for security,
humanitarian, or development needs � advances US
interests.�
Finally, the new U.S. policy will stress engagement
through bilateral ties with individual African states
instead of reliance on multilateral bodies such as
the World Bank and the U.N. The U.N.�s human-rights
record in its African peacekeeping missions, for
example, has been horrendous and has only played into
China�s pose as Africa�s last best hope.
All this represents a breath of fresh air in
America�s policy toward Africa and gives us an
important, benign and active role in the coming
scramble for Africa that will dominate much of the
21st century. Will that competition lead to greatpower
tensions like those of the 19th century? Not if
the U.S., unlike China, which treats African
countries as neo-colonial dependents, invites African
countries to be partners in a new order for the subSaharan
region � and for the United States.
In end, how ironic will it be that while President
Obama, who proudly touted his African heritage,
allowed Russian and Chinese malign influence � as
well as that of ISIS and Boko Haram � to grow in
Africa. Donald Trump, the man whom the media and
liberals and some conservatives paint as a racist, is
the one on course to become the liberator of Africa
from Chinese neo-colonialism and to set the continent
on the path to peace and prosperity at long last.
Jimmy Carter on USA, China, and Africa
Washington Post, Dec. 31, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y8b84jvg
"The United States should return to the Paris climate
accord and work with China on environmental and
climate-change issues, as the epic struggle against
global warming requires active participation from
both nations. But I believe the easiest route to
bilateral cooperation lies in Africa. Both countries
are already heavily involved there in fighting
disease, building infrastructure and keeping peace �
sometimes cooperatively. Yet each nation has accused
the other of economic exploitation or political
manipulation. Africans � like billions of other
people around the world � do not want to be forced to
choose a side. Instead, they welcome the synergy that
comes from pooling resources, sharing expertise and
designing complementary aid programs. By working
together with Africans, the United States and China
would also be helping themselves overcome distrust
and rebuild this vital relationship."
Trump�s Africa strategy should have cast China as a
regional partner, not a global adversary
December 17, 2018
John J Stremlau
Visiting Professor of International Relations,
University of the Witwatersrand
University of the Witwatersrand provides support as a
hosting partner of The Conversation Africa.
https://theconversation.com/africa
https://allafrica.com/stories/201812180581.html
US President Donald Trump has finally approved a �New
Africa Strategy�. His national security adviser, John
Bolton, described the contents on 13 December at the
conservative Heritage Foundation in Washington. He
began positively, declaring that:
lasting stability, prosperity, independence and
security on the African continent are in the national
security interest of the United States.
But he then went on to ignore Africa�s own efforts to
address these broad challenges, including its
multilateral initiatives. Instead, Bolton�s
announcement was replete with rhetoric reminiscent of
the Cold War.
The new strategy makes one thing clear: what really
matters to Trump is not Africa but containing and
countering China.
The reaction from an African perspective is likely be
bemusement rather than surprise. Trump has shown
little interest or empathy towards Africa. And much
enmity toward China. His Africa strategy ignores two
decades of complex � but generally positive �
reactions across sub-Saharan Africa to China becoming
the region�s biggest trading partner and a major
source of aid and investment.
Previous US administrations generally welcomed
Chinese engagement in Africa. Bolton, however,
alleged that:
China uses bribes, opaque agreements, and the
strategic use of debt to hold states in Africa
captive to Beijing�s wishes and demands.
But does it need to be this way? I would argue not.
Africa offers China and America an opportunity to
demonstrate to the world � and to each other � that
their competition can be constructive with Africa
playing a moderating influence by brokering an agreed
trilateral agenda.
We need to explore ways to advance cooperation
between Africa, China and the US as a confidence
building measure in relations between the US and
China. This would obviously need to be designed for
the primary benefit of African partners.
Testing trilateralism
Collaborative projects that involve the US and China,
with Africa in the forefront, have been the focus of
a Carter Centre project since 2014. The centre�s many
successful programs in Africa, especially public
health, have generated high-level trilateral policy
interest. Since the Trump administration took over,
these conversations have excluded his senior
advisors. Nevertheless, work has continued. This has
included recent developments which suggest headway is
being made.
In early December the South African Institute of
International Affairs hosted the troika that leads
this project. The troika was represented by Seyoum
Mesfin, Ethiopia�s former and longest-serving foreign
minister, an ambassador to China, and regional
mediator in Sudan; Zhong Jianhua, formerly China�s
Special Representative on African affairs and to the
Sudan conflicts; and Donald Booth, a former US
ambassador to Liberia, Zambia, Ethiopia and special
envoy to Sudan/South Sudan.
Three dozen African, Chinese and US scholars as well
as policy experts contributed their analyses of
previous and possible future areas for trilateral
cooperation. They drew on some recent examples. These
included efforts to combat piracy off the Horn of
Africa and Gulf of Guinea as well as jointly
developing a university campus in Liberia. Other
projects have involved coordinated mediation between
Sudan and South Sudan and mutually reinforcing
actions to deal with the Ebola epidemic in West
Africa.
Challenges ahead
Several priority areas for future tri-lateral
cooperation were identified.
One was the recently constructed headquarters for the
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention in Addis
Ababa. Funded by China, the next priority for
trilateral cooperation is to ensure the centre is
equipped to provide better early warning and response
to threats like Ebola.
Another priority area is expanding economic aid,
trade and investment. This could be done through
trilateral projects funded under China�s �Belt and
Road� initiative and the US Build Act. The act was
approved in October by a large bi-partisan majority
of the US Congress.
A related issue is the huge loss of vital tax revenue
to African governments due to huge �illicit financial
flows�. These are estimated to exceed annual inflows
of foreign assistance. The project will seek ways to
encourage US and China to support the work of a panel
set up by African Union and United Nations Economic
Commission for Africa.
Two other broad areas for potential trilateral
cooperation are sustainable agriculture and energy.
Two initiatives started by the Obama Administration,
with the support of Congress, have become popular in
Africa. These are the �Feed the Future� and �Power
Africa�.
Trump has long wanted to cut both. But his negative
attitude isn�t shared by the US Congress, and perhaps
even key members of his administration. Assistant
Secretary of State for Africa, Tibor Nagy, summarised
US-Africa policy before the House Foreign Affairs
Committee on the same day Trump approved the new
Africa strategy. Nagy�s comments reflected a
different mindset. He spoke positively about the two
Obama initiatives. He also didn�t seem alarmed by
China�s growing presence.
At a time when many in Africa are debating how to
build capable states without the undesirable aspects
of either America�s �decadent� democracy or China�s
�responsive� authoritarianism, engaging both should
yield important insights for advancing collective
self-reliance and development.
AfricaFocus Bulletin is an independent electronic
publication providing reposted commentary and
analysis on African issues, with a particular focus
on U.S. and international policies. AfricaFocus
Bulletin is edited by William Minter.
AfricaFocus Bulletin can be reached at
[email protected]. Please write to this address to
suggest material for inclusion. For more information
about reposted material, please contact directly the
original source mentioned. For a full archive and
other resources, see http://www.africafocus.org
|