|
Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!
Print this page
|
Note: This document is from the archive of the Africa Policy E-Journal, published
by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC) from 1995 to 2001 and by Africa Action
from 2001 to 2003. APIC was merged into Africa Action in 2001. Please note that many outdated links in this archived
document may not work.
|
Zambia: HRW Report
Zambia: HRW Report
Date distributed (ymd): 970729
Document reposted by APIC
This posting contains a summary of the findings and recommendations
of a recent Human Rights Watch/Africa report on Zambia. The report was
issued earlier this month, prior to the July 10-12 World Bank Consultative
Group meeting on Zambia. At the end of that meeting, the World Bank announced
that "premised on satisfactory economic and governance performance,
Zambia's external partners indicated plans to make available in 1997 at
least US$150 million in balance of payments support, plus an additional
US$285 million in project assistance."
For more information, contact:
Human Rights Watch
485 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10017-6104
Tel: 212/972-8400
Fax: 212/972-0905
E-mail: [email protected]
1522 K Street, NW
Washington D.C. 20005
Tel: 202/371-6592
Fax: 202/371-0124
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: http://www.hrw.org
Gopher: gopher://gopher.humanrights.org:5000/11/int/hrw
Listserv instructions: To subscribe to the general HRW e-mail list (to
receive press releases and public letters concerning all regions of the
world), send an e-mail message to [email protected]
with "subscribe hrw-news" in the body of the message (leave the
subject line blank). To subscribe to the sub-Saharan Africa-specific list
(to receive press releases and public letters only on sub-Saharan Africa),
send a message to [email protected]
with "subscribe hrw-news-africa" in the body of the message (leave
the subject line blank).
ZAMBIAN GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO FAIL ON HUMAN RIGHTS OBSERVANCE
(New York, July 4, 1997)--International ambivalence of the run-up to
the November 1996 elections and their outcome had resulted in a donor freeze
that specifically targeted balance of payments support. Most efforts by
the government in the post-election period are largely aimed so that aid
flows that were frozen before the November 1996 elections are resumed.
These changes are mostly superficial.
Zambia. The Reality Amidst Contradictions: Human Rights Since the
1996 Elections, released by Human Rights Watch/Africa a week ahead
of the World Bank Consultative Group meeting on Zambia in Paris (France),
reports that the Chiluba administration has made a few begrudging, and
mostly cosmetic efforts to improve its human rights record. According to
Peter Takirambudde, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch/Africa,
"President Chiluba must make human rights improvements such as
an autonomous human rights commission, an independent judiciary and a total
respect for freedom of expression, association and assembly. The Zambian
government has since April been trying to portray itself as having taken
human rights issues seriously, but we have found that many of these efforts
are superficial."
Since the November 1996 elections there have been fewer incidents of
harassment and intimidation of the independent media than in the pre-election
period, but blatant violations still occurred. These abuses included charges
before the courts against the independent media or the short-term imprisonment
of four journalists.
Zambia Information Service acting deputy director Mundia Nalishebo was
suspended with five other state media journalists in November after allegations
that they had collaborated with a local election monitoring NGO that had
found the elections neither free nor fair. More ominously, the state tried
to introduce in March legislation to form a Media Council, which would
force journalists to register with the state, would strip journalists deemed
ineligible of the right to work and those who continued would face jail
terms and fines. After considerable controversy and international outcry,
the state suspended consideration of the bill in April. It has yet to be
tabled.
The 71-page report details how the government's record on respect for
free assembly and association has been poor, although there have been insignificant
improvements since the 1996 elections. The three local human rights NGOs
that declared the 1996 multiparty elections not "free and fair"
have been victimized by the state. On November 24 and 25, police raided
the offices of the Committee for a Clean Campaign (CCC), the Zambia Independent
Monitoring Team (ZIMT) and the offices of the Inter-Africa Network for
Human Rights and Development (Afronet) and documents seized despite lawyers'
assertions that the search warrants were not valid. Many of these documents
have still not been returned.
The Foundation for Democratic Process (FODEP), which also declared that
the elections were not free and fair, was targeted by the government. FODEP
had received tax exempt status from the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA)
because it was operating on a grant aimed at strengthening the democratic
process, including election monitoring and local government elections.
On December 19 it received a tax demand for outstanding tax arrears for
K27 million (approximately U.S. $21,000).
The opposition has also been harassed in the immediate post election
period. For example, the main opposition, the United National Independence
Party (UNIP), found its attempts to hold a peaceful rally in Ndola in February
blocked by the police. There has also been occasional harassment of relatives
of senior UNIP officials such as Vida Ngoma, the eighty year-old aunt of
Betty Kaunda, former President Kaunda's wife, who was detained and kept
in a cell for two days with a corpse after police searched her house without
a warrant.
For much of early 1997, a presidential petition has been the main focus
of Zambian political life. The petition, being heard in the Supreme Court,
was brought by the opposition against President Chiluba, challenges the
elections and President Chiluba's constitutional right to the presidency.
Some of the witnesses brought to testify in this case have been harassed
with death threats being reported by some witnesses. One witness, Theresa
Kalo, was arrested and held for several days by police after she testified,
three other witnesses reportedly went into hiding, apparently out of fear
of arrest.
The establishment of a permanent Human Rights Commission in March 1997,
was, in principle, a welcome development. Yet there are substantive problems
with it. The commission's composition and its limited resources and powers
still raise many questions. The hasty process by which the government appointed
its members, most of whom lack robust human rights credentials, has drawn
broad domestic criticism, and to date the commission appears to have no
program and no activities to report. The commission also lacks premises
and resources. The promotion of the commission's creation internationally,
with a view of improving Zambia's image, has also contrasted with its public
profile in Zambia. Officials in the government printing office there told
Human Rights Watch/Africa that the documents concerning the commission
were available "only to diplomats," after initially denying they
were had ever been printed. These documents have, however, been widely
distributed to international donors; it is likely that the creation of
the commission was rushed so that it would be in place prior to the April
25 preliminary meeting of the Consultative Group of donors in London. The
commission has not had an auspicious start.
The international community's efforts towards seeking improved human
rights and good governance practice in Zambia have been exemplary. The
stick and carrot approach of offering renewed balance of payments support
in return for positive actions by the Zambian government has had some results.
At the forthcoming July 10-11 Consultative Group meeting in Paris, agreed
balance of payments resumption in tandem with built-in conditionality is
needed so that these minor improvements are likely to become meaningful
and sustainable.
RECOMMENDATIONS
To the Zambian Government
Based on the findings of this report, Human Rights Watch/Africa calls
on the Zambian government to:
- Facilitate debate of the proposals of the 1995 Mwanakatwe Constitutional
Review Commission 1995 proposals that major constitutional reforms first
be agreed to by a constituent assembly and be subjected to a referendum.
- Facilitate the establishment of a truly independent Electoral Commission
and an accurate and credible register of voters.
- Call fresh elections to a constituent assembly to review and, as appropriate,
amend the Constitution of 1991 and the Constitutional Amendment Act of
1996.
- Ensure that all Zambians have the opportunity to participate meaningfully
in the constitution-making and reform process through open, public debate
and analysis until consensus is reached.
- Re-appoint commissioners on the permanent Human Rights Commission through
a process that is transparent and open to national debate and dialogue.
Ensure that commissioners are elected in a manner that is objective and
nonpartisan and that is not subject to political bias.
- Abide by the international human rights treaties to which Zambia is
a party, notably the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
taking action to this effect to:
- guarantee the independence of the judiciary as required by Zambian
and international law;
- respect freedom of expression, lifting arbitrary restrictions on the
print media and public broadcasting and ceasing harassment and arbitrary
detention of journalists, political commentators and others solely for
the expression of their opinion;
- respect freedom of assembly, lifting the arbitrary restrictions imposed
by law and in practice on public meetings and halting arbitrary police
actions to ban or disperse such meetings and demonstrations;
- respect freedom of association, halting arbitrary arrests, intimidation
and acts of violence targeting participants in nonviolent civil organizations;
- recognize the rights of human rights defenders in Zambia to monitor,
investigate, and speak out on human rights concerns and freely to associate
with others nationally and internationally in the promotion and protection
of human rights;
- investigate allegations of police abuse and improper treatment of those
in detention and hold those found responsible accountable before the law;
- provide government officials and police with special training about
human rights standards and protection, while instituting procedures that
ensure the effective investigation and criminal prosecution of violations
of human rights, especially through the permanent Human Rights Commission;
and
- Abolish the death penalty in any of its forms.
To All Political Parties
Human Rights Watch/Africa recommends all Zambian political parties to:
- Publicly advocate the protection and respect for human rights in their
platforms and promise to hold party members who commit human rights abuses
accountable.
To the International Community
Human Rights Watch/Africa recommends the international community to:
- Maintain the pressure and continue to tie assistance, particularly
balance of payments support, to the achievement of clear and firm benchmarks
that lead towards democratic and human rights progress. This strategic
use of aid to ensure compliance is all important;
- Ensure a linkage of balance of payments support to cooperation between
the government of Zambia and all national stakeholders and a respect for
human rights and the rule of law;
- Utilize conditionality as a human rights instrument; but also use policy
dialogue and positive measures as incentives not only to encourage change
but also to maintain and perpetuate improvement in human rights observance;
- Provide further moral, financial and technical support to the efforts
of organizations of civil society such that they may play an active role,
particularly in monitoring, lobbying and campaigning for improved human
rights standards;
- Target aid to support an independent judiciary, the development of
a robust and independent Human Rights Commission and the independent media;
and
- Leave humanitarian or development aid unrestricted. Poverty alleviation
projects should be furthered and encouraged.
Human Rights Watch/Africa calls on The World Bank's Consultative Group
for Zambia to:
- Continue the Bournemouth meeting's agreed pressure on the Zambian government
for "tangible progress on the governance issue," and include
specific reference to human rights as integral to this; and
- Maintain unity in the continual pressure for an improved Zambian government
performance on human rights as integral to good governance.
Human Rights Watch/Africa calls on Canada, E.U. member states, Japan,
Norway, and the United States to:
- Encourage their diplomatic representatives in Lusaka to continue their
commitment to the vigorous promotion of human rights in Zambia by meeting
regularly with the Zambia human rights community, publicly denouncing human
rights abuses and using their bilateral assistance to Zambia to achieve
maximum leverage on human rights.
Copies of Zambia. The Reality Amidst Contradictions: Human Rights
Since the 1996 Elections are available from the Publications Department,
485 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017-6104 for $10.50 (domestic shipping),
$11.50 (Canada) and $15.00 (international shipping). Visa and Master Card
accepted.
Human Rights Watch is a nongovernmental organization established in
1978 to monitor and promote the observance of internationally recognized
human rights in Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East and among the
signatories of the Helsinki accords. Kenneth Roth is the executive director
and Robert L. Bernstein is the chair of the board. Its Africa division
was established in 1988 to monitor and promote the observance of internationally
recognized human rights in sub-Saharan Africa. Peter Takirambudde is the
executive director and William Carmichael is the chair of the advisory
committee.
This material is being reposted for wider distribution by the Africa
Policy Information Center (APIC), the educational affiliate of the Washington
Office on Africa. APIC's primary objective is to widen the policy debate
in the United States around African issues and the U.S. role in Africa,
by concentrating on providing accessible policy-relevant information and
analysis usable by a wide range of groups and individuals.
|
